Cybersquatters Facing An Expansion Of The Anti-cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act

This case demonstrates that the expansion of the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, and not the Federal Trademark Dilution Act in which in-rem actions can be brought independently of a bad faith claim.

The following questions have been addressed in this article:

What was the former precedence in regards to cybersquatting?
How did this ruling expand cybersquatting?
What is the lesson for businesses to consider?


Facebook Twitter RSS