Speech That Goes Beyond Being Merely Provocative And Is Threatening In Nature Will Not Be Protected

The Ninth Circuit United States Court of Appeals in a 6-5 split upheld a jury verdict against anti-abortion activists concluding that their speech was not merely provocative speech protected by the First Amendment. The Court found that their speech crossed the line and was threatening in nature. This decision will be appealed to the Supreme Court.

The following questions have been addressed in this article:

What are the facts of this case?
What did the trial court determine?
How did the Court of Appeals arrive at its decision?
What did the dissents filed in this case state?
What will the effects of this case?


Facebook Twitter RSS